Cinema Monolith

Reviews of movies from my giant DVD tower, and more.

Horror of Dracula

Horror of Dracula - poster finalThis film is part of the Cinema Monolith collection!This movie was watched on Svengoolie!

Cinema Monolith: 6/10
IMDb: 7.5/10
The Motion Pictures: 4/5

Released in the US on May 8, 1958 and in the UK on June 16, 1958
Not rated
82 minutes

Directed by Terence Fisher

Written by Jimmy Sangster, from the novel by Bram Stoker

Cast: Peter Cushing, Christopher Lee, Michael Gough, Melissa Stribling, Carol Marsh, Olga Dickie, John Van Eyssen, Janina Faye, Charles Lloyd Pack, Barbara Archer, Miles Malleson, Valerie Gaunt

Hammer Films kicked off its storied vampire franchise with this well-paced and atmospheric offering, the first of nine Dracula films released by the company between 1958 and 1974, and the first of three to feature both Christopher Lee and Peter Cushing. Lee was fantastic as the fabled Count Dracula, jumping into the part with both feet and heaping large doses of elegance and menace into the character, while Cushing was serious and fearless as the vampire hunter Van Helsing; he may not have looked the part, but he most certainly played it with conviction.

Terence Fisher, who directed Cushing in thirteen films and Lee in twelve, seemed to have a flair for directing Gothic horror, and that skill was quite evident here. To me, he set just the right mood by letting his camera tell the story, and he allowed scenes to play out at a relaxed pace while the heavy atmosphere played havoc with your nerves. What I liked best about this film was how Fisher lulled you into a false sense of security with a static shot or dialogue scene, then chilled your heart with a slow but unexpected reveal, or the sudden appearance of someone from just off-camera, which was punctuated by a jarring crescendo of music.

Fisher set this tone early with the arrival of Jonathan Harker at Dracula’s castle, where Harker awaited Dracula’s return; after several moments of minimal sound and no dialogue, a woman suddenly approached from behind Harker—a simple shot that really goosed me—and soon a crashing music cue signaled the eerie arrival of the Count from the top of a high staircase. From there, Van Helsing and Dracula battled it out stake and fang for supremacy over the town of Klausenberg; in the former’s case, for the safety of its denizens, and for the latter, the seduction of its women (and for good measure, their young nieces as well).

On the technical side, Fisher continued to impress me with his filmmaking skills, which is why, perhaps, he directed 18 more horror films (by my count) over the next sixteen years. He was quite deft with his moving camera, and artfully filled the frame to maximum effect, using elaborate set design to establish mood and enhance his shots. And the way he staged certain scenes in Horror of Dracula, you got the idea that female victims were experiencing sexual fantasy and fulfillment with each vampirical visit; this was still 1958, when any hints of cinematic sexuality and gore were kept to an of-the-times minimum. Yet here, Fisher allowed both aspects to creep onto the screen…and in a not-so-subtle way.

As I’d mentioned, the thunderous music score was a plus, and Jimmy Sangster’s script was smooth and efficient, and delivered some smart dialogue. Why then, after all this praise, am I punishing the film with a fairly lukewarm rating? Look no further than the ridiculous acting of Michael Gough, playing the role of Arthur, whose anachronistic stage-drama style and overboard delivery were laughable in their execution, and destructive in their existence. Yes, he was that bad, and it’s unfortunate the film had to suffer because of it.  (6/10)

Horror of Dracula

6 comments on “Horror of Dracula

  1. grandrapidsgirl

    Hot dog! I finally remembered my password. The 6 was a little surprising until the last paragraph when the little bit of negativity erupts. Another great job TRB! Always makes me wanna watch the flick. ’58 was good year. 🙂

    Your blog hates me!


    • Todd Benefiel

      Yeah, I was thinking about scoring this thing a 7 or 8, but I couldn’t let Gough’s performance go…otherwise, a fun little vampire flick that you might enjoy watching. And my blog doesn’t hate you…it allowed you to comment, didn’t it? Send me that password quick, so if you forget it again, I can e-mail it to you! 😉 Thanks, Julie!


  2. Rating movies is such a hard thing to do because while some flicks get a 5 out of 10 vs. the 9/10 it’s all objective. Not always fair when a low budget flick gets tossed into the same ratings machine as The Wizard of Oz. I love this flick and yes we all beat up on Michael Gough but if we keep the film in its genre it has to score a solid 9. 🙂 Having said that let’s at least agree that Jaws scores the BIG 10!


    • Todd Benefiel

      Take Michael Gough out of the equation, and replace him with anyone else – Clint Eastwood, Jonathan Winters, Pele, doesn’t matter – and this film would get a 7 or 8 rating from me, easily. But you’re right, it’s all objective, and sometimes I have a hard time deciding what score I should give a small, cheesy B-movie that I really like, but most everyone else wouldn’t.

      Last night I watched the original Not of This Earth for the first time, and thought it was great; do I give it a 9 because it’s a fun, smart Roger Corman cheapie I enjoyed, or a 5 because it’s a Roger Corman cheapie that the rest of the world – minus ‘bad cinema’ fans like you and I – would find no entertainment value in? Hmmmm…maybe I’d go with a 7, for balance between the two factions.

      But I will say this: YES, a definite 10/10 for Jaws, without a doubt! But I should also mention that I’d give The Wizard of Oz nothing more than a 2/10. Kidding!


      • Bang on about Not of this Earth. Top notch for a Corman quickie.


      • Todd Benefiel

        Cool…glad someone else saw what I saw in it! There’s a few of those Corman horror films from the 50s and 60s that really show some smarts, and have quite a few neat moments for such low budgets. I felt the same way about Attack of the Crab Monsters…some interesting concepts for such a goofy premise!


Feel free to comment, you readers of the Monolith!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Enter your email address and click the button below to become a bona fide Cinema Monolith follower. C'mon, what's the worst that could happen?

Join 209 other subscribers

Review Totals

Movies Reviewed: 232

From the Monolith: 129

Movies by Decade

1920s – 0
1930s – 6
1940s – 20
1950s – 39
1960s – 34
1970s – 36
1980s – 36
1990s – 7
2000s – 13
2010s – 41

Movies by Genre

Action/Adventure – 43
Comedy – 35
Crime – 23
Documentary – 5
Drama – 28
Horror – 38
Musical – 1
Mystery/Thriller – 19
Romance – 3
Sci-Fi/Fantasy – 28
Western – 8

Movies by CM Rating

10 star – 10
9 star – 28
8 star – 36
7 star – 34
6 star – 22
5 star – 23
4 star – 25
3 star – 18
2 star – 20
1 star – 13
0 star – 3

Movies by MPAA Rating

Pre-1968 – 94
G – 1
PG – 32
PG-13 – 35
R – 60
NC-17 – 0
TV and Unrated – 10

Blogathons I’ve Joined

The Coolest Links

This review has been approved by Team Banzai!
%d bloggers like this: