Cinema Monolith

Reviews of movies from my giant DVD tower, and more.

Our Kind of Traitor

our-kind-of-traitor-posterCinema Monolith: 4/10
IMDb: 6.2/10
Rotten Tomatoes: 71%

Released in the UK on May 13, 2016 and in the US on July 1, 2016
Rated R
108 minutes

Directed by Susanna White

Written by Hossein Amini, based on the novel by John le Carré

Cast: Ewan McGregor, Stellan Skarsgård, Damian Lewis, Naomi Harris, Khalid Abdalla, Velibor Topic, Jeremy Northam, Alicia von Rittberg, Mark Gatiss, Mark Stanley, Grigoriy Dobrygin, Alec Utgoff, Lucy Holt, John le Carré

I’d read John le Carré’s spy thriller Our Kind of Traitor a few years ago and liked it; it was the first espionage novel of his that I’d ever read, and I thought at the time it would make for a good movie, if placed in the right hands. Then, just a few days ago, during a visit to my local library, I saw that it had been made into a movie, just last year in fact, and I was surprised that I hadn’t heard of its release. Was it a straight-to-video job, or had it come and gone from theaters in a matter of minutes? This didn’t bode well for me: when any book I’ve enjoyed is adapted for film, the question I always ask myself is: will it be as good as—or perhaps better than—the source material?

In this instance, the answer was no. Ewan McGregor plays Perry MacKendrick, a university professor from London on vacation with his wife in Morocco, who one night is befriended by a happy-go-lucky Russian, named Dima, while sitting alone in a restaurant. Soon Perry discovers that Dima is actually a happy-go-lucky money launderer for the Russian Mafia, who fears for his life and wants out. In exchange for safe asylum, he’ll hand over information to the British government linking the gangsters with British politicians. Perry agrees to help both Dima and MI6 with the situation, but of course things go sour when the mob becomes suspicious, and the plan begins to fall apart.

And yes, I’d have to say the film went sour and fell apart as well. The excitement, tension, foreign intrigue, and character interactions that made the novel such an interesting and gripping read were, for whatever reason, jettisoned by the filmmakers and replaced with lifeless storytelling, a miserably slow pace, and a frustrating lack of spark. Though the photography was first-rate (and to me was the film’s only saving grace), the same couldn’t be said for Susanna White’s direction, which too often jumped between sharp and sloppy, and the underplayed work of the actors, including that of our leads McGregor, Stellan Skarsgård, and Naomi Harris, who all seemed disinterested and ready to go home.

Mostly, though, my problem was with the screenplay, which was just flat-out dull. I don’t recall the events of the book page for page, but it seemed to me the film story followed a different path than that of the novel, which was not only unfortunate but puzzling, because the novel was so much more captivating, and offered a structure and tone that to me should not have been tampered with. I also had zero tolerance for the acute carelessness of the characters, who had me shaking my head in disbelief far too often; considering the high stakes and dangers involved, there sure were a lot of poor decisions being bandied about, whether one was new to espionage or not.

Lackluster when it should’ve been exciting, drawn-out when it should’ve been fast-paced, and not enough tension or thrills to make it worthy of the ‘espionage’ label; perhaps I would’ve thought better of Our Kind of Traitor if I hadn’t read the book first, but even so, there was really nothing here to set it apart from the hundreds of better and more involving spy thrillers that are out there. In fact, I counted nine previous adaptations of le Carré’s books—from 1963’s The Spy Who Came in from the Cold to 2014’s A Most Wanted Man—and I’m guessing any one of those would make for a smarter and more satisfying viewing choice than this one.  (4/10)

our-kind-of-traitor-photo

Advertisements

6 comments on “Our Kind of Traitor

  1. You are absolutely bananas. Any lack of attention / reaction here has ZERO to do with the quality of your review and is simply a coincidence and likely bad-timing for your following – period. It is a great review w/o any hint at a rush-job or different approach or carelessness whatsoever!

    That said… isn’t it a “rule of thumb” that the book is ALWAYS better than the film? Sorry this was such a disappointment especially with Ewan-baby in the leading role! I will now for sure see this b/c I had no clue of its existence. Clearly a marketing blunder there if it went unnoticed. Fast or slow – keep up the great work TB!! 🙂

    • Todd B
      1/27/17

      Ha, I don’t know what’s worse: no comments, or being told I’m screwy! Thanks for jumping in and not breaking my comment streak! And MOST of the time the book is better than the movie, but there are two that come to mind that I thought were better than the book: The Taking of Pelham One Two Three and Soylent Green.

      And please, don’t ever use the term ‘Ewan-baby’ on my site again! 😉

  2. Oh great – a typo. Bah! You get my drift.

    • Todd B
      1/27/17

      Bah! Typo fixed! And know one will ever know what it was!

  3. dracula
    1/28/17

    I noticed the author of the book is also in the cast. What part did he play? Somebody walking across the street or did he actually have a line?

    • Todd B
      1/28/17

      It was an uncredited cameo, and I didn’t notice him (not that I knew what he looked like), but according to IMDb he played ‘Museum Guard in Bern’. And I have no idea if he had any lines; I’d check, but I already took the movie back to the library.

Feel free to comment, you readers of the Monolith!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Enter your email address and click the button below to become a bona fide Cinema Monolith follower. C'mon, what's the worst that could happen?

Join 143 other followers

Review Totals

Movies Reviewed: 161

From the Monolith: 89

Movies by Decade

1920s – 0
1930s – 4
1940s – 12
1950s – 23
1960s – 30
1970s – 22
1980s – 25
1990s – 5
2000s – 10
2010s – 30

Movies by Genre

Action/Adventure – 28
Comedy – 33
Crime – 9
Documentary – 1
Drama – 17
Horror – 29
Martial Arts – 0
Musical – 1
Mystery/Thriller – 14
Romance – 3
Sci-Fi/Fantasy – 19
Western – 6

Movies by Rating

10 star – 9
9 star – 19
8 star – 24
7 star – 22
6 star – 14
5 star – 15
4 star – 17
3 star – 12
2 star – 15
1 star – 11
0 star – 3

Blogathons I’ve Joined

The Coolest Links

%d bloggers like this: