Cinema Monolith

Reviews of movies from my giant DVD tower, and more.

The Dead Pool

Cinema Monolith: 5/10 The MonolithFilm Reel
IMDb: 6.3/10
Leonard Maltin’s Movie Guide: **½ out of 4

Released on July 13, 1988
Rated R
91 minutes

Directed by Buddy Van Horn

Written by Steve Sharon

Cast: Clint Eastwood, Patricia Clarkson, Liam Neeson, Evan C. Kim, David Hunt, Michael Currie, Michael Goodwin, Jim Carrey, Anthony Charnota, Ronnie Claire Edwards, Louis Giambalvo, Patrick Van Horn

As excited as I was when Sudden Impact was released in 1983, I felt nothing but indifference when The Dead Pool—the fifth and final installment in the Dirty Harry series—hit theaters five years later. I hadn’t expected to ever see another Dirty Harry film released, and I’m not even sure I wanted to see another one; to me it felt like its time had come and gone. But I went to see it just the same, and the perplexing thing is, I know for a fact I went, but I remember nothing of the experience: not the city, not the theater, not the person I went with…nothing!

And good lord, did I ever despise this movie after seeing it that first time; so much, in fact, that I never watched it again until last night, when I did so for this review. And that’s when something crazy happened: I didn’t hate it nearly as much as I had before. In fact, it actually kept me interested throughout, and I ended up liking it much more than I had Sudden Impact. And since I hadn’t remembered all that much about it anyway, the story and situations were mostly new to me, and the film surprisingly had me entertained for most of its short run time.

Clint Eastwood returns as SFPD homicide inspector ‘Dirty’ Harry Callahan, and after all these years of newsworthy tactics and arrests, he’s become a popular subject for the local Bay Area media; though the police department loves all the positive press, Harry is uncomfortable with it. When he makes the news for helping put a mobster in prison, he soon finds himself in a ‘dead pool’, a game where players try to predict which celebrities will die soon. As more and more names are crossed off the list, and Harry investigates the crimes, he becomes the target of a demented killer.

So what was it that I was noticing now, and even enjoying now, that I wasn’t then? First off, and most noticeably, was the absence of Sondra Locke from the film (thank you, Patricia Clarkson!), which meant the story—and camera—could go back to concentrating more on Eastwood than on her. I also liked how Eastwood seemed more like Callahan again, specifically his expressions, his mannerisms, and the way he spoke, and how he spent more time in the squad room and at crime scenes, engaged in police business, instead of hanging out with Locke or walking a flatulent dog.

And there were also some nice callbacks to earlier films: reporter Clarkson had a book of Callahan news clippings, where you could spot stories taken from Dirty Harry (his arrest of Scorpio) and Magnum Force (the department’s pistol shooting contest); a scene took place near the big white church seen in Dirty Harry; and snippets of Lalo Schifrin’s obnoxious ’80s score were similar to the string score heard in the first film. Also, back from his role in Sudden Impact was Michael Currie as Donnelly, Callahan’s superior and one of the few characters from the last two films I liked.

Contrary to what critics Roger Ebert (“As good as the original!”) and Gene Siskel (“Perhaps the best Dirty Harry film since the original!”) had to say about it, The Dead Pool still wasn’t all that great; the opening gun battle between Callahan and some mob thugs was horribly directed, the radio-controlled car chase was beyond ridiculous (yet is loved by many, including Eastwood), and the ending—where Harry is holding a harpoon gun big enough (ahem) and outlandish enough to look foolish in a whaling adventure—was just too simple and obvious, and should’ve been better rendered. But I’ll give it this: it’s no longer the least favorite Dirty Harry film I’ve ever seen.  (5/10)

14 comments on “The Dead Pool

  1. Yeah I never really gelled with this one either, the one I’ve never bothered rewatching. Good to know you thought the same and saved me the time 🙂


    • Todd B

      Well, if you’re ever trying to choose between Sudden Impact and The Dead Pool to watch on a slow night, I’d go with The Dead Pool. Or, watch BOTH some night, back-to-back, and see if you agree that Dead Pool is the better film!

      Liked by 1 person

      • On refreshing my mind through your reviews I’m convinced The Dead Pool was better, seems I recall more of it. But I don’t think I will be rushing to see them as the “to watch” pile is insane. Though I’m very tempted to get on The Enforcer again and you know if the first Dirty Harry comes on the telly, I’m watching it again and again.


      • Todd B

        Definitely skip watching The Dead Pool if your to-watch stack is high…there are better films out there to spend a Saturday evening with. But The Enforcer…add it to the pile, and get to it ASAP!


      • I certainly will. Very much looking forward to it


      • Todd B

        Maybe you can have your own theme week of movie reviews, with films that have ‘enforcer’ in the title. Which including the Humphrey Bogart film from 1951, would total…well, I was going to say ‘2’, but there seems to be quite a few movies listed on IMDb that fit the bill. So…go for it!

        Liked by 1 person

      • Sounds like a most excellent idea searching down similar titled films in a connected movie marathon meltdown. I got to see the Bogie Enforcer at the beginning of the year and I gave it a strong 10/10 absolutely loved it. Cheers buddy


      • Todd B

        I’ve never seen the Bogart Enforcer, so I’ll have to check it out and add it to my Bogie index. Cheers back, dude!

        Liked by 1 person

      • I did do a post on it in January. Not real spoilers in there but if you are going to see it soon maybe just have a quick scan. It’s very recommended for me.


      • Todd B

        I gave the review a quick scan, and I like what I read, so I’ll track this down for a watch. A ‘lost’ Bogart for me…but then again, any Bogart film I’ve never seen I consider ‘lost’. A lot of cool names in that cast…worth watching for that aspect alone.

        Liked by 1 person

  2. Now you’ve got me thinking I need to re-watch this. I don’t recall too much either but do recall it has a good cast of soon to be famous people. Oh and a fortune cookie scene. Hmm mm. Time to cue up a disc?


    • Todd B

      I’d say yes, it’s time to cue up a disc! Like I told Wolfman, maybe watch this one and Sudden Impact back-to-back, and decide if I’m right about them, or just plain screwy.


  3. Julie Dunning

    The new “Dead Pool” is better (and funny!).


Feel free to comment, you readers of the Monolith!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Enter your email address and click the button below to become a bona fide Cinema Monolith follower. C'mon, what's the worst that could happen?

Join 209 other subscribers

Review Totals

Movies Reviewed: 225

From the Monolith: 130

Movies by Decade

1920s – 0
1930s – 6
1940s – 20
1950s – 39
1960s – 34
1970s – 36
1980s – 36
1990s – 7
2000s – 13
2010s – 34

Movies by Genre

Action/Adventure – 41
Comedy – 34
Crime – 24
Documentary – 5
Drama – 26
Horror – 38
Musical – 1
Mystery/Thriller – 16
Romance – 3
Sci-Fi/Fantasy – 28
Western – 8

Movies by CM Rating

10 star – 10
9 star – 28
8 star – 34
7 star – 35
6 star – 22
5 star – 23
4 star – 22
3 star – 16
2 star – 19
1 star – 13
0 star – 3

Movies by MPAA Rating

Pre-1968 – 94
G – 1
PG – 32
PG-13 – 30
R – 58
NC-17 – 0
TV and Unrated – 10

Blogathons I’ve Joined

The Coolest Links

This review has been approved by Team Banzai!
%d bloggers like this: